Wednesday, January 30, 2008
The Yellow Wallpaper
The Chrysanthemums
The first time I read it I noticed the theme was that there is a sense of duty. When Elisa takes care of her Chrysanthemums she takes great pride in caring for them. She is so involved in them that it seems her life is revolved around them. She kind of treats them like her children with the intense year round care for them.
The other theme that I came across was that the grass is not always greener on the other side. With Elisa’s intense care for her flowers, her sense of duty, she seems to want to get away. It seems that she wants to live the life of the wonderer, and get away from her boring life. She wants to experience a different life that is very different from her own. When the wonderer explains that his life is very difficult and very straining, Elisa realizes that she cannot leave her husband and her life. That is why she gave the wonderer a Chrysanthemum. She gave it to him to take her place. With these two themes the story is very confusing, but once you realize them it became clearer. John Steinbeck wrote a great short story that was thought provoking and interesting
The Chrysanthemums
The Chrysanthemums
She seems to have communication problems with her husband. He tries to talk and complement her work."You"ve got a gift with things"(633) For some reason she doesnt show interest in what he is saying.When the man showed up at the farm she was not talkative. He wanted to do some work for her, to earn some money. Until he showed interest in the flowers, she wanted to send him on his way. She was happy that he liked her flowers and wanted to help him out. Somehow he got her to open up. She seemed to change at this point. It was almost like she had finally found someone she could talk to and trust. After he left, it was almost like she wanted to try to make her relationship work with her husband. When heading into town with her husband and she saw the flowers she had given the man on the side of the road, she was pissed. I dont know how she could open up to a perfect stranger but couldnt with her husband. Maybe seeing the flowers on the road opened her eyes to try harder with her husband.
The Chrysanthemums
I think the reason why she was so angry and upset in the end is because out of everyone in her life, a stranger got under her skin. Someone she didn’t even know got her to be a person of softness and excitement as derived from this quote, “The irritation and resistance melted from Elisa’s face. ‘Oh, those are chrysanthemums, giant whites and yellows…,'” (Steinbeck, 635-51). Once the wagon man saw that she found pride in taking care of the chrysanthemums and how she loved them so, he dug into that weakness by getting her to talk more about them and she did so. When she asked him if he knew what planter’s hands were, “her breast swelled passionately,” (Steinbeck, 636-72) and she seemed almost breathless and vulnerable after talking about the chrysanthemums. It was then when the wagon man pressed on her vulnerability by stating he would have no dinner tonight. She then felt guilty and decided to give him saucepans to work on for fifty cents.
When he left, that was probably when she realized that she wasn’t as strong as she always believed herself to be. This angered her because she then went to bathe, “Then she scrubbed herself … until her skin was scratched and red,” (Steinbeck, 638-93). It seemed like she was trying to wash the shame (or truth?) from her body. She knew that the wagon man manipulated her and seeing the pile of the dirt that was originally from her flower pot that the wagon man dumped on the side of the road confirmed her suspicions. That is probably why she was so snippy to her husband when he complimented her, she felt justified to try to feel “strong” again and this was the only way she knew how to feel strong – by being bossy-like to her husband, and being back in control. But I think in reality she was only fooling herself because she knew the truth: she was weak. Now I wonder how she actually feels about her precious chrysanthemums. Does she hate them now because they represent her definite weakness? Would she be so passionate about them now, knowing how the wagon man manipulated her with the chrysanthemums?
The Chrysanthemums
"A Rose for Emily"
In the story emily never really grips the death of her family and once her true love Homer Baron wants to leave her she is unwilling to let him leave. She goes to the local pharmacy buys arsenic and kills Homer with the poison. Emily goes on with her regular life like nothing has happened even so much as to pretend their still "happy". The towns people start to smell awful odors coming from the house and try to confront her about the smell, she wont say a word and tells them to go away.
the story is a sad story, and i can still see some simularities today. People with always have a hard time coming to grips with loss, however they do deal with it in better ways than her. I think emily's problems are a direct correlation from the way she was brought up and I feel sorry for her.
The Chrysanthemums
Gender specific ideas were a constant theme throughout this story and show a lot about the characters.
A rose for emily
Obviously the main character Emily is suffering from some sort of mental illness. She doesn't want to believe her father died, and then kills Homer Baron because she does not want anybody else to have him. To me she seems lonely and will do almost anything to have a companion. What really grossed me out was in the end of the story the last lines that said, "We noticed that in the second pillow was the indentation of a head. One of us lifted something from it, and leaning forward, the faint and invisible dust dry and acrid in the nostrils, we saw a long strand of iron-gray hair"(212). This proves that she did not only kill him so he would stay with her forever, but she also laid by his dead body which to me is really sick.
Besides some of the bizarre things going on in the story, A Rose for Emily did give me a good idea of how times were in the deep south in a small town. Everybody seemed gossipy, and everybody wanted to know each others business. On Emily's behalf i can understand why she probably felt crazy, everyone wanted to know what was going on with her,and in her business. Not only was this town gossipy but it seemed to be very racist and full of bigots.
Overall the story was a good read and having the discussion in class really helps me look deeper into the story and really understand in depth what is going on. It makes the story a lot more enjoyable.
A Rose for Emily
"The yellow wallpaper"
"The Storm"
On the surface this story just seemed like a tale of suppressed passions coming to fruition. It’s hard not to despise Calixta and Alcee for what they do. They are both married and whether or not they harbored these feelings from long ago, they still have no excuse for committing adultery.
After having the class discussion, I really see how well Chopin was able to use the storm as a symbol of the sin that is committed. In the beginning I love how the clouds “were rolling with sinister intention” (Chopin 255). What great use of foreshadowing for what’s about to happen.
Later we see how the rain came “down in sheets obscuring the view of far-off cabins” (Chopin 257) really illustrating how there was a feeling of isolation in that cabin. They felt that they could get away with what they were about to do. Then, as the atrocious act is about to happen, “they did not heed the crashing torrents” (Chopin 257) showing their lack of moral fiber to resist their own lusts.
With all of this in mind, I really still feel sad. These are two people who knew full well what they were doing; yet they still do it. Even worse, after all is said and done “everyone was happy” (Chopin 259). How could Calixta and Alcee just go on and pretend as if nothing had happened when they had committed the ultimate betrayal against their spouses? Sad.
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
"The Yellow Wallpaper"
Jason Brown
Saturday, January 26, 2008
A Rose for Emily
Friday, January 25, 2008
A Rose for Emily
"A Rose for Emily"
Emily showed total disregard to her surrondings. It was her butler who took care of her.
"The Negro man went in and out wiht the market basket, but the front dooor remained closed.
After classroom group discussion I came to the realization that Emily was lonely. "After her father's death she went out very little; after her sweetheart went away,people hardly saw her at all.
Questions that arised during discussion, where is Emily's family? With her father being dead
who else could there be. "Emily had some kin in Alabama:but years ago her father had a fallen out with them over the estate and there was no communication between the two families."
Emily had a beau once, but he left Emily. It came to be around the same time as her father's death. Poor Emily no one in her life. So when Homer Barron fixed the streets by Emily's house.
Emily swarmed in on Homer, like a vulture to a dead carcus. Emilys' lonely no more.
At story's end, town people pried into the only room not on display during viewing the house. "In the bed lay a man. Next to the man a pillow with a indentation to which a long strand of grey hair was found."
I find the storm a interesting story. The really interesting part about the story was the can on Shrimp, In the beginning i didn't know what the can of Shrimp really meant but to read later on in the story I found out that he was for the family that he was suppose to return to right after he got the can of Shrimp so that they can eat. During the storm these two people became closer then they have before the storm or maybe they had something before but broke it off and now want to be together. The reason why they want to together because the thought of death scares them and they don't want to leave this beautiful place alone. In the story in says "Do you remember---in Assumption, Calixta?" that tells you that they were into each other and something happened. At the end of the story his family or mom seems to get mad at him because he is all dirty, shortly after he shows them the can of Shrimp and everything is alright... I really didn't get the ending, all around I liked this story!
"The Story of an Hour"
a rose for emily
"The Story of a Hour"
To understand A Rose for Emily, one must understand the environment and the setting of the story. One must realize during this time in the Deep South, as well as much of it today, the people had an immense sense of tradition and sense of duty. Knowing this sense of tradition and duty is a crucial role to understanding the story. I personally have not experienced the south and all there traditions, but I have experienced the similar traditions of small town and there environments. Everybody has to know everyone’s business and what’s going on in their lives.
Now the town had many different characters and one never really gets a sense of who is really narrating the story. So you truly get a sense of who Miss Emily is because you get the description of the whole town. The characteristics of Miss Emily seem to be an intense sense of tradition and duty. With having these senses she also seems very unwilling to change. This was shown when she was unwillingly to leave the corpse of her dead lover Homer Barron. Not only did she seclude herself from the town, but the town secluded her also, because of the harsh smell coming from her house.
Wednesday, January 23, 2008
The Story of an Hour
What confused me the most was, “There was something coming to her and she was waiting for it, fearfully” (Chopin, 193-9.) I figured that was because she was experiencing sorrow and heartbreak for the first time following her husband’s death. But then the story twists into a plot of, “She did not stop to ask if it were not a monstrous joy that held her” (Chopin, 194-12). Joy? Someone who were happily married and someone who loved would never feel that way with death of someone very close to her.
I honestly don’t think I have enough evidence in the story or details that could tell me whether Mrs. Mallard was abused (emotionally or physically). My theory that she was set up to be married to Bentley Mallard by her parents and I assume people who married without love would most likely be unhappy inside? This theory of mine is derived from the book where it said, “There will be no powerful will bending her in that blind persistence with which men and women believe they have a right to impose a private will upon a fellow creature” (Chopin, 194-14) and “yet she had loved him – sometimes” (Chopin, 194-15.) It is possible to love someone when you have been with him for many years even when you don’t intentionally mean to love him hence the “sometimes” statement.
So with the theory of mine, I actually think it makes sense why Mrs. Mallard is relieved to be let go of the “burden,” (for the lack of a better word) of her marriage. I think it is very interesting in the end when Mrs. Mallard died – as a reader myself, I know the thoughts in her mind, the emotions she felt before she died so it gives me another perspective of why she really died. Did she die from the joy that her husband was indeed alive? Or did she die from the sheer horror that he was alive, from actual heartbreak knowing she would now never be free? I believe it is the latter, because I think when the author said “joy that kills” (Chopin, 194-23) she is actually talking about the “monstrous joy that held her”.
That joy is what made her want to live, didn’t it?
" The Story of an Hour"
After re-reading i found out what "The Story of an Hour" was really about. When i first read the story i thought that the wife was really rude and mean. How could she have been happy to hear her husband had died? My first thoughts made me really dislike this story, and all i really had got from it was that a husband had died and the wife was happy! I also didn't really realise he was still alive until our group discussions inside of class. I liked the discussion in our groups because it made me look at the story in a total different way, this helped make the story more interesting for me. I also obviously had a better understanding and began to like this story more because you could look at it from many points of view. Was Mrs. Mallard happy her husband died because he was abusing her or just because she felt trapped in her marriage? Since divorce was not really accepted in these times maybe she felt some release to be out of a bad marriage? This was pointed out in my group discussion which made me re-think my view of the wife, and not really hate Mrs. Mallard so much. You never know what she was living through and why she felt the way she did about her husband. Another cool thing i thought we did in class was answer the questions on the board. About being in a long term relationship, being married, or the passing of someone close to you. Answering these questions made me see why people had different views of the story. Your life experiences can really effect how you view this short story.
I think the author Kate Chopin did a good job of writing this story it was full of small details that really make the story come together. Another thing that i thought was cool was the last line of the story when Mrs. Mallard dies. She wrote, " When she came they said she had died of heart disease-of joy that kills"(194) . You can look at this line in a couple different rays. One being that she had heart problems and died, or you could look at in another way. Maybe she was so hurt to find out that her husband had actually survived that she passed away, like dieing from a broken heart. Over all i do like the authors style and think she did a good job of writing this short story.
The Story of an Hour
Posting again.....
the story of an hour
Yellow Wallpaper
"The story of an Hour"
Jason Brown
Tuesday, January 22, 2008
"The Story of an Hour"
The beginning of this story makes me feel pity. I feel like giving poor Mrs. Mallard a hug and consoling her. She is in such a tough spot, or so it seems.
Then I, as the reader, see a different side to her; an ugly side. She starts to have this feeling creep up to her. She says “she was striving to beat it back with her will” (Chopin 194). Yet, having read the entire story, I really don’t believe that she did. Regardless, in the end she submits to this emotion- a feeling of release.
How disgusting is this? I am angered further as she describes her husband’s “kind, tender hands” and “the face that had never looked save with love upon her” (Chopin 194). Yet, she cannot seem to wait to move on.
She’s the victim really; a victim of the notion of marriage, commitment to another. She speaks of this commitment in saying, “a kind intention or a cruel intention made the act seem no less a crime as she looked upon it in that brief moment of illumination” (Chopin 194). She sits there and tries to convince herself of all of these things, just so she can live her life for her.
After having first read this story I felt that Mrs. Mallard was a terribly vile, selfish person. It has been suggested that she may have been beaten and that’s why she felt this way. I really cannot convince myself that this is true; I still think she is just selfish. I find solace in the ending. In that great act of poetic justice, the person who really does die is the one deserving it the most: poor Mrs. Mallard!
Thursday, January 10, 2008
Welcome!
This is the course blog for College Writing II at the Higher Education Center. Each student has access to post to this site. So does anyone else in the world: my friends, your parents, a teenager from Istanbul, etc. :)
Let me layout some basic guidelines beyond what I put in the handouts in D2L:
1. When you create your profile or log-in name, please make it something I'll recognize so I can grade accordingly.
2. Keep posts academic in tone and diction. They can be personal but should not be information you would not want to share with the world.
3. See these sources for help on posting, for directions on linking to another page, and tips on editing your posts.
4. Please do not write about other classes/instructors in this blog unless it is relevant to the unit materials and is not personal/rant-ish.
To get started with the blog, look for an email from me with the subject "You have been invited to contribute to J. Beyer's blog." It contains instructions for joining the blog.
You may want to visit my other class blogs to see sample posts and what you will be doing in this blog!